The Algorithmic Loop in Intensifying Brainrot and Reducing Language Learning Focus

Authors

  • Nyak Mutia Ismail Universitas Serambi Mekkah, Indonesia
  • Lismalinda Institut Seni Budaya Indonesia Aceh, Indonesia
  • Sitti Jamilah Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Tahir Institut Seni Budaya Indonesia Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57176/jn.v5i2.208

Keywords:

Algorithmic exposure, brainrot intensity, cognitive load, Language learning focus, short-form media

Abstract

Brainrot,defined by a tendency toward excessive micro-scrolling, persistent audio reassurance and an increased fondness for overstimulating short-form,has become a major cognitive phenomenon among young adults. However, it is relatively unexplored how algorithmic recommender systems reinforce this state and what roles this plays in academic processes (e.g. English learning). The current study is based on a quantitative explanatory research design and involves 321 daily TikTok or Instagram users. Four latent constructs were investigated: Algorithmic Exposure, Brainrot Intensity, Cognitive Load and Language Learning Focus. The confirmatory factor analysis showed high both construct validity and the model fits well (CFI =. 956, RMSEA =. 052). Algorithmic exposure was a powerful predictor of brainrot intensity (β =. 72, p <. 001), and this inhibition subsequently had a significant impact on cognitive load (β =. 66, p <. 001). Cognitive load had a relatively large negative influence on language learning attention (β = –. 58, p <. 001). There was no significant direct path from algorithmic exposure to learning focus verifying full mediation by brainrot and cognitive load. This suggests the influence of algorithmically curated digital environments on learning is not immediate, but rather it works its effect through cognitive breakdowns that limit learners’ ability to sustain focus in vocabulary building, reading comprehension and grammar processing. The findings of this study suggest that ELT education should include training in algorithmic literacy and attention management to help people cope with the increasing cognitive demands put forward by short-form social media.

References

Arévalo-Mercado, C. A., Muñoz Andrade, E. L., Cardona Reyes, H., & Romero-Juarez, M. G. (2023). Applying cognitive load theory and the split attention effect to learning data structures. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 18(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2023.3250580

Silva, B. (2022). The writing cycle and cognitive processes that may affect learning. In Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 45–62). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06505-7_3

Boldbaatar, N., & Şendurur, E. (2019). Developing educational 3D games with starlogo: The role of backwards fading in the transfer of programming experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(6), 1468–1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118806747

Chen, Z.-A., & Huang, P.-S. (2021). Effect of micro-courses on learners’ attention and memory retention. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 52(4), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0007

Chew, C. S., Idris, N., Loh, E. F., Wu, W.-C. V., Chua, Y. P., & Bimba, A. T. (2019). The effects of a theory-based summary writing tool on students’ summary writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12349

Dosse, L. A., Pabst, D. M., Wismer, S. E., & Barry, M. M. (2024). Beyond the bind and between the lines: Focus group insights into an interactive-online textbook. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893595

Dubé, M., Kaba, A., Cronin, T., Barnes, S., Fuselli, T., & Grant, V. (2021). Correction to: COVID-19 pandemic preparation: using simulation for systems-based learning to prepare the largest healthcare workforce and system in Canada (Advances in Simulation, (2020), 5, 1, (22), 10.1186/s41077-020-00138-w). Advances in Simulation, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00165-1

Geary, D. C., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Evolutionary perspectives on educational psychology: Motivation, instructional design, and child devel3opment. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2221–2227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09710-4

Huang, H., & Li, M. (2024). The impact of technology-enhanced language learning environments on second language learners’ willingness to communicate: A systematic review of empirical studies from 2012 to 2023. Language Learning and Technology, 28(1), 1–22. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85216120316&partnerID=40&md5=94bf2cbcdacd993daa46c15a19acb69c

Jabar, M., Sherer, P. P., Paek, S. C., & Chiong-Javier, E. (2025). Ethical Technology assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and the internet of things (IoT) among Gen Z population in Thailand and the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 25(3), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1578

Kasabov, N., Fard, M. H., Petrova, K., & Wang, G. Y. (2021). Studying transfer of learning using a braininspired spiking neural network in the context of learning a new programming language. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718472

Lai, S., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Exploring the determinants of users’ intention to use augmented reality in craftsmanship-oriented intangible cultural heritage games. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251359021

Monjoree, U., Aguilar, S. D., Qian, C., van Huyck, C., Yeh, S.-H., Tranbarger, P., Duane-Tessier, L., Solitare-Renaldo, L., Burte, H., Yasskin, P., Liew, J., Song, D., Quek, F., & Yan, W. (2024). AR-classroom: Integrating conversational artificial intelligence with augmented reality technology for learning spatial transformations and their matrix representation. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893308

Mundy, C., & Potgieter, M. (2019). Refining process-oriented guided inquiry learning for chemistry students in an academic development programme. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1622223

Robins, A. V. (2019). Novice programmers and introductory programming (pp. 327–376). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555.013

Roussel, S., & Galan, J.-P. (2018). Can clicker use support learning in a dual-focused second language German course? Language Learning and Technology, 22(3), 45–64. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055650831&partnerID=40&md5=7348b8d090f381937a3fdc37598aa4f3

Roussel, S., Joulia, D., Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2017). Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: A cognitive load theory approach. Learning and Instruction, 52, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.007

Sandoval-Medina, C., Arévalo Mercado, C. A., Muñoz Andrade, E. L., & Muñoz-Arteaga, J. (2024). Self-Explanation effect of cognitive load theory in teaching basic programming. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.62273/GMIV1698

Sasayama, S., & Norris, J. (2019). Unravelling cognitive task complexity learning from learners’ perspectives on task characteristics and second language performance. In Task-Based Language Teaching (Vol. 13, pp. 95–132). https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.06sas

Seidel, A., Weidle, F., & Borner, C. (2021). Evaluating game and learning mechanics separately: A practical approach to evidence-based serious game development. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 631–639. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.21.069

Serenelli, F., Ruggeri, E., Mangiatordi, A., & Ferri, P. (2011). Applying the multimedia learning theory in the primary school: An experimental study about learning settings using digital science contents. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, (2), 943–952. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84939216796&partnerID=40&md5=7cbf5581c64ff2e34c0ae70d7fd67bac

Sinha, A., Goyal, S., Sy, Z., Kuperus, R., Dickey, E., & Bejarano, A. (2024). BoilerTAI: A platform for enhancing instruction using generative AI in educational forums. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893137

Soosai-Raj, A. G. S., Gu, P., Zhang, E., Rayan, A. X. R., Williams, J., Halverson, R., & Patel, J. M. (2020). Live-coding vs static code examples: Which is better with respect to student learning and cognitive load? 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373165.3373182

Stiller, K. D., & Schworm, S. (2019). Game-based learning of the structure and functioning of body cells in a foreign language: Effects on motivation, cognitive load, and performance. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00018

Tang, H., Liu, X., & He, H. (2024). Is Multimodal dictation practice more effective than audio-only dictation? 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET61814.2024.00039

Tay, J., Safiena, S., Lan, T., Lim, M. S., & Goh, Y. M. (2024). Design for safety training for construction professionals: A digital game-based learning approach. Safety Science, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106588

Tomas, F., Tsimperidis, I., Demarchi, S., & El Massioui, F. (2021). Keyboard dynamics discrepancies between baseline and deceptive eyewitness narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3743

Xu, C., Sun, Y., & Zhou, H. (2025). Artificial aesthetics and ethical ambiguity: Exploring business ethics in the context of ai-driven creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 199(4), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05837-2

Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024). Contextualized game-based language learning: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(1), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231189292

Yeh, H.-Y., Tsai, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-K. (2017). Android app development for teaching reduced forms of EFL listening comprehension to decrease cognitive load. 2018-March, 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.82

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Ismail, N. M., Lismalinda, Jamilah, S., & Tahir, M. (2026). The Algorithmic Loop in Intensifying Brainrot and Reducing Language Learning Focus. Journal of Nusantara Education, 5(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.57176/jn.v5i2.208

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): April 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nyak Mutia Ismail, Lismalinda, Sitti Jamilah, Muhammad Tahir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  3. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.